Pick Rulings

Note that this is not the final decision, but it will influence admin decisions.... closes at noon tomorrow.

If your saying that The teams like Clevland and etc. That traded for players by giving draft picks to the other teams I say. Let them have no 1st. I mean they had _________ player then there getting another? Not fair.

could you explain the options??

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

superskin6 wrote:

could you explain the options??

yeah im lost, idk whats going on

OK there were some trades that were made during the 2007 draft in real life. Like the Browns traded their 2nd and 2008 1st to Dallas for their 1st in order to take Brady Quinn.

But Madden doesn't input these trades, so in the game, Cleveland has their 1st. Anyway, some teams were not aware of these trades and traded these picks to other teams. So like if Cleveland didn't know of that trade, they might have traded their 1st to the Vikings (they didn't but there are a couple of those trades).

So we are deciding whether to reverse the so called trade between the Browns and the Vikings, but that sets off a chain reaction which will deny about 20 trades that were processed.

Understand?

Not really. I mean, I was told I had my San Fran first, and I want it.

SoxNats08 wrote:

OK there were some trades that were made during the 2007 draft in real life. Like the Browns traded their 2nd and 2008 1st to Dallas for their 1st in order to take Brady Quinn.

But Madden doesn't input these trades, so in the game, Cleveland has their 1st. Anyway, some teams were not aware of these trades and traded these picks to other teams. So like if Cleveland didn't know of that trade, they might have traded their 1st to the Vikings (they didn't but there are a couple of those trades).

So we are deciding whether to reverse the so called trade between the Browns and the Vikings, but that sets off a chain reaction which will deny about 20 trades that were processed.

Understand?

Do what ever is eassier

superskin6 wrote:

Not really. I mean, I was told I had my San Fran first, and I want it.

Well either way I'm pretty sure you'd get it...

SoxNats08 wrote:

superskin6 wrote:

Not really. I mean, I was told I had my San Fran first, and I want it.

Well either way I'm pretty sure you'd get it...

It's now mine, biatch!

idk cuz if you go one way, people will complain, yet if youd go another, more ppl would complain

Desert Demon wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

superskin6 wrote:

Not really. I mean, I was told I had my San Fran first, and I want it.

Well either way I'm pretty sure you'd get it...

It's now mine, biatch!

You have the New England, and I'm refraining from voting.

I think if teams traded their picks last year they shouldnt have them this year... Its not fair if a team like the Browns traded their first last year and got Brady Quinn so they get Brady Quinn but they also get to keep their first, it also screws over the Cowboys who could have another good rookie on their team but now dont...

superskin6 wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

superskin6 wrote:

Not really. I mean, I was told I had my San Fran first, and I want it.

Well either way I'm pretty sure you'd get it...

It's now mine, biatch!

You have the New England, and I'm refraining from voting.

https://madden360league.forummotion.com/post.forum?mode=quote&p=11894

Desert Demon wrote:

Arizona Cardinals get:

FS Brandon Merriweather 82 1 23 (Don't think he should be on 1 year though)
SS Sean Jones 87 2 25
2008 1st round pick 49ers


New England Patriots get:

SS Adrian Wilson 97 3 26



I agree. Cardinals have a lot of holes, so I sacrifice one of my young studs to fill 3 holes up. Patriots are very talented and get a young superstar on defense. Patriots might appear to give up a lot, but in reality they upgrade at SS, Meriweather was just their backup, and they have 2 firsts. I think this works out for both sides.

superskin6 wrote:

The Pats agree.

Wildcats wrote:

Approved 3-0

Says 49ers.

OK, the poll is closed... thanks guys.

OK we are going to go with comp picks.