Kobe Wins MVP

chris paul deserved it much more than kobe

Nerd85 wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

kobe deserved it much more than chris paul:x

No Way Kobe=Great on offense, not so great at everything else
Chris Paul=Good scorer, good passer, good defender, good rebounder, good everything.

Finaly about damn time Godbe wins one.

A sweep of the Nuggets and more to come

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

Finaly about damn time Godbe wins one.

A sweep of the Nuggets and more to come

he did have a sick game 1 against the jazz

PatsDynasty wrote:

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

Finaly about damn time Godbe wins one.

A sweep of the Nuggets and more to come

he did have a sick game 1 against the jazz

Where he did nothing but shoot...

half the games he had like 204 points hes like 5-43434 shooting and he has 3 assists and crap. a real good player like Paul has confidence within his team mates and will pass them the ball and not be a huge dick.

PackersOwnAll wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

Finaly about damn time Godbe wins one.

A sweep of the Nuggets and more to come

he did have a sick game 1 against the jazz

Where he did nothing but shoot...

half the games he had like 204 points hes like 5-43434 shooting and he has 3 assists and crap. a real good player like Paul has confidence within his team mates and will pass them the ball and not be a huge dick.

actually he had 38 points, 7 assists, 6 rebounds, and he was shooting 50% so.... i dont kno wat ur talking about

PatsDynasty wrote:

PackersOwnAll wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

Finaly about damn time Godbe wins one.

A sweep of the Nuggets and more to come

he did have a sick game 1 against the jazz

Where he did nothing but shoot...

half the games he had like 204 points hes like 5-43434 shooting and he has 3 assists and crap. a real good player like Paul has confidence within his team mates and will pass them the ball and not be a huge dick.

actually he had 38 points, 7 assists, 6 rebounds, and he was shooting 50% so.... i dont kno wat ur talking about

dude that sucks... 50%?

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

PackersOwnAll wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

Finaly about damn time Godbe wins one.

A sweep of the Nuggets and more to come

he did have a sick game 1 against the jazz

Where he did nothing but shoot...

half the games he had like 204 points hes like 5-43434 shooting and he has 3 assists and crap. a real good player like Paul has confidence within his team mates and will pass them the ball and not be a huge dick.

actually he had 38 points, 7 assists, 6 rebounds, and he was shooting 50% so.... i dont kno wat ur talking about

dude that sucks... 50%?

not really michael jordan shot 50% for his career and he was sick, so 50% isnt that bad

Andris Biedrins shot 63% in the regular season averaging 30 min a game..

SoxNats08 wrote:

Andris Biedrins shot 63% in the regular season averaging 30 min a game..

yea but everyone would agree that mj is better than andris biedrins and anyways u dont always have to be a high percent shooter to be a great player and still 50 percent is not bad

PatsDynasty wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Andris Biedrins shot 63% in the regular season averaging 30 min a game..

yea but everyone would agree that mj is better than andris biedrins and anyways u dont always have to be a high percent shooter to be a great player and still 50 percent is not bad

I know that, and I was making the case that if you score 38 pts, that means you shot like 15/30 or so, which isn't that great. If you can't count on your leading scorer to make the basket, then that is not good.

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

PatsDynasty wrote:

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

if he shot 50%, that means he made 9 shots... did he get like 20 free throws or somethin

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

if he shot 50%, that means he made 9 shots... did he get like 20 free throws or somethin

yep he had 23 free throws and he made 21 of them, so that makes him a reliable scorer

PatsDynasty wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

if he shot 50%, that means he made 9 shots... did he get like 20 free throws or somethin

yep he had 23 free throws and he made 21 of them, so that makes him a reliable scorer

that makes him a flopper

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

if he shot 50%, that means he made 9 shots... did he get like 20 free throws or somethin

yep he had 23 free throws and he made 21 of them, so that makes him a reliable scorer

that makes him a flopper

lol

No love for Godbe?

Well anyways he desevred it more then anyone else in the NBA, the last few seasons he should of been the guy but now it is his time. And once he gets that another ring should be on that finger

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

No love for Godbe?

Well anyways he desevred it more then anyone else in the NBA, the last few seasons he should of been the guy but now it is his time. And once he gets that another ring should be on that finger

thats what i call some complete homerism

this is how i judge the most VALUABLE player:

how many less wins would the team have without this player?

The Lakers would have won like 50-55 games without him... the Celtics would have won about 45-50 games without KG... the Hornets would have won 30-35 games without Paul... the Cavs would have won about the same without James.

So I would put James or Paul as MVP if I could vote.

SoxNats08 wrote:

SilverNBlackAttack wrote:

No love for Godbe?

Well anyways he desevred it more then anyone else in the NBA, the last few seasons he should of been the guy but now it is his time. And once he gets that another ring should be on that finger

thats what i call some complete homerism

this is how i judge the most VALUABLE player:

how many less wins would the team have without this player?

The Lakers would have won like 50-55 games without him... the Celtics would have won about 45-50 games without KG... the Hornets would have won 30-35 games without Paul... the Cavs would have won about the same without James.

So I would put James or Paul as MVP if I could vote.

lebron had great stats this season but since the mvp isnt completely about stats cp3 deserves the mvp

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

if he shot 50%, that means he made 9 shots... did he get like 20 free throws or somethin

yep he had 23 free throws and he made 21 of them, so that makes him a reliable scorer

that makes him a flopper

that doesnt make him a flopper it just means he drives to the basket alot

PatsDynasty wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

PatsDynasty wrote:

yea, but first of all he only took 18 shots so if u score 38 points in that many attempts its good and it means they r a dependable scorer

if he shot 50%, that means he made 9 shots... did he get like 20 free throws or somethin

yep he had 23 free throws and he made 21 of them, so that makes him a reliable scorer

that makes him a flopper

that doesnt make him a flopper it just means he drives to the basket alot

flopper