Posting stats

They take about the same time to do. Note that I won't do both, its one or the other.

Here are some pros for each one to help you out:

Pros for top 4 yards leaders:

-Worse teams get to see their players stats
-You get more information on your players

Pros for statistical leaders:

-You get a lot more info than yards per game
-You get defensive players too

yeah i like the top 4 per team..

SoxNats08 wrote:

Here are some pros for each one to help you out:

Pros for top 4 yards leaders:

-Worse teams get to see their players stats
-You get more information on your players

Pros for statistical leaders:

-You get a lot more info than yards per game
-You get defensive players too

Yards is yards; my 68 WR was posted, merely because he's a return man (and my #4 WR).

I think having more stats, such as total yards, ypc, receiving yards, tackles, defense, etc. is more important than simply yards for each team.

I think a better way would be to:

Post for each game the top: Passer, Rusher, Receiver, and Defense. Make a judgement - if a guy is 100 yards catching and 3 TDs vs 250 yards 0 TDs, post the 3 TDs guy. Defense - Not always highest tackler, sometimes INTs, Sacks, etc.

Desert Demon wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Here are some pros for each one to help you out:

Pros for top 4 yards leaders:

-Worse teams get to see their players stats
-You get more information on your players

Pros for statistical leaders:

-You get a lot more info than yards per game
-You get defensive players too

Yards is yards; my 68 WR was posted, merely because he's a return man (and my #4 WR).

I think having more stats, such as total yards, ypc, receiving yards, tackles, defense, etc. is more important than simply yards for each team.

I think a better way would be to:

Post for each game the top: Passer, Rusher, Receiver, and Defense. Make a judgement - if a guy is 100 yards catching and 3 TDs vs 250 yards 0 TDs, post the 3 TDs guy. Defense - Not always highest tackler, sometimes INTs, Sacks, etc.

thats to much work

NorCal-TitanFan wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Here are some pros for each one to help you out:

Pros for top 4 yards leaders:

-Worse teams get to see their players stats
-You get more information on your players

Pros for statistical leaders:

-You get a lot more info than yards per game
-You get defensive players too

Yards is yards; my 68 WR was posted, merely because he's a return man (and my #4 WR).

I think having more stats, such as total yards, ypc, receiving yards, tackles, defense, etc. is more important than simply yards for each team.

I think a better way would be to:

Post for each game the top: Passer, Rusher, Receiver, and Defense. Make a judgement - if a guy is 100 yards catching and 3 TDs vs 250 yards 0 TDs, post the 3 TDs guy. Defense - Not always highest tackler, sometimes INTs, Sacks, etc.

thats to much work

Then keep it how it is.

I would rather have no knowledge about my team (Except I know that BJ was top 10 WR first 2 weeks, and Larry Fitzgerald still is), and know the 'best' top 10 players at passing, receiving, and rushing (even if they are organized by yards, and not other statistical categories), and also have knowledge of defensive stat leaders, than to have just 4 guys per game with their total yards (Like I said, my #4 68 overall WR was listed; he's my returner as well, so it doesn't really mean much).

Arent they the same just without highlighting the Main guy with the most yards and etc?

Desert Demon wrote:

NorCal-TitanFan wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

Here are some pros for each one to help you out:

Pros for top 4 yards leaders:

-Worse teams get to see their players stats
-You get more information on your players

Pros for statistical leaders:

-You get a lot more info than yards per game
-You get defensive players too

Yards is yards; my 68 WR was posted, merely because he's a return man (and my #4 WR).

I think having more stats, such as total yards, ypc, receiving yards, tackles, defense, etc. is more important than simply yards for each team.

I think a better way would be to:

Post for each game the top: Passer, Rusher, Receiver, and Defense. Make a judgement - if a guy is 100 yards catching and 3 TDs vs 250 yards 0 TDs, post the 3 TDs guy. Defense - Not always highest tackler, sometimes INTs, Sacks, etc.

thats to much work

Then keep it how it is.

I would rather have no knowledge about my team (Except I know that BJ was top 10 WR first 2 weeks, and Larry Fitzgerald still is), and know the 'best' top 10 players at passing, receiving, and rushing (even if they are organized by yards, and not other statistical categories), and also have knowledge of defensive stat leaders, than to have just 4 guys per game with their total yards (Like I said, my #4 68 overall WR was listed; he's my returner as well, so it doesn't really mean much).

Yea thats why I thought you guys would want statistical leaders.

yeah, how you did it for the last sim

First one to ten will be what I do...

Statistical leaders FTW!

Nerd85 wrote:

Statistical leaders FTW!

Same, thats what I decided on because it gives a lot more info.

Since we haven't come to a consensus, for Week 10 I will post up stats leaders.

sox, i want to switch my vote from league leaders to 4 top stats

ok its 9-7 then

SimsZilla wrote:

sox, i want to switch my vote from league leaders to 4 top stats

I changed the thread so that you can cancel your vote. It will be easier to keep track that way.

superskin6 wrote:

SimsZilla wrote:

sox, i want to switch my vote from league leaders to 4 top stats

I changed the thread so that you can cancel your vote. It will be easier to keep track that way.

looks good.

Top 10 stats might give more info but it doesnt help out teams who dont have anyone in any of the categories...

mksadng wrote:

Top 10 stats might give more info but it doesnt help out teams who dont have anyone in any of the categories...

True. But again, top 4 yards don't tell shit. My #4 WR (who was also my KR) was listed at #3 for one of the games in yards - that doesn't mean he did shit, he could be averaging 10 yards per return, and returned a total of 7 kicks for 70 yards, then caught for another 70. Larry Fitzgerald, my only player listed in top 10 categories, is #5, he has a lot of yards and catches, now THAT actually tells me something.

Desert Demon wrote:

mksadng wrote:

Top 10 stats might give more info but it doesnt help out teams who dont have anyone in any of the categories...

True. But again, top 4 yards don't tell shit. My #4 WR (who was also my KR) was listed at #3 for one of the games in yards - that doesn't mean he did shit, he could be averaging 10 yards per return, and returned a total of 7 kicks for 70 yards, then caught for another 70. Larry Fitzgerald, my only player listed in top 10 categories, is #5, he has a lot of yards and catches, now THAT actually tells me something.

Yes but the top 4 yards tells EVERY team who got the most yards on their team, the other way only tells a few teams how a couple players are doing and some teams have no players in any categories so their clueless as to how their players are performing.

mksadng wrote:

Desert Demon wrote:

mksadng wrote:

Top 10 stats might give more info but it doesnt help out teams who dont have anyone in any of the categories...

True. But again, top 4 yards don't tell shit. My #4 WR (who was also my KR) was listed at #3 for one of the games in yards - that doesn't mean he did shit, he could be averaging 10 yards per return, and returned a total of 7 kicks for 70 yards, then caught for another 70. Larry Fitzgerald, my only player listed in top 10 categories, is #5, he has a lot of yards and catches, now THAT actually tells me something.

Yes but the top 4 yards tells EVERY team who got the most yards on their team, the other way only tells a few teams how a couple players are doing and some teams have no players in any categories so their clueless as to how their players are performing.

I don't give a fuck about knowing how well my KR, of all players, is doing (Unless he's got several TDs). I'd rather see how my QB, or RB, or WR, or defense is among the leagues best.

Here's an incentive to have a player rated: Win games.

bump

top 4 players in each team

I'd like to see.

The simple stats.

Like QB stats, RB stats and etc.

That's good, thanks guys... I'll just post up leaders from now on.