LOLB Mike Vrabel 89 2 33

Harper41 wrote:

My deals better Dyson>3rd

lol maybe for you.

Pats Get:
LB Tyjuan Hagler 73/27
DT Colin Cole 72/28
Packers 3rd Round Pick
Packers 5th Round Pick

Packers Get:
LB Mike Vrabel 89/33?
??

PackersOwnAll wrote:

Harper41 wrote:

My deals better Dyson>3rd

lol maybe for you.

Pats Get:
LB Tyjuan Hagler 73/27
DT Colin Cole 72/28
Packers 3rd Round Pick
Packers 5th Round Pick

Packers Get:
LB Mike Vrabel 89/33?
??

Junk.
Junk.
Decent.
Junk.

Its the high offer though...

CB Andre Dyson 78
WR Dallas Baker 70 25
DT Tim Anderson 72 26
FOR
Mike Vrabel

Harper41 wrote:

CB Andre Dyson 78
WR Dallas Baker 70 25
DT Tim Anderson 72 26
FOR
Mike Vrabel

junk
junk
junk

Harper41 wrote:

CB Andre Dyson 78
WR Dallas Baker 70 25
DT Tim Anderson 72 26
FOR
Mike Vrabel

That's a decent and 2 junks.

I'm getting a decent and 3 junks.

PackersOwnAll wrote:

Harper41 wrote:

CB Andre Dyson 78
WR Dallas Baker 70 25
DT Tim Anderson 72 26
FOR
Mike Vrabel

junk
junk
junk

Dallas Baker>Tyjuan Hagler
Tim Anderson>Colin Cole
Dyson> 3rd and 5th
My junk shits on your junk

superskin6 wrote:

Harper41 wrote:

CB Andre Dyson 78
WR Dallas Baker 70 25
DT Tim Anderson 72 26
FOR
Mike Vrabel

That's a decent and 2 junks.

I'm getting a decent and 3 junks.

Dysons better than decent. Hed be your #3 CB. The junk your getting from him would most likely never see the field and my junk is better than his junk.

Harper41 wrote:

PackersOwnAll wrote:

Harper41 wrote:

CB Andre Dyson 78
WR Dallas Baker 70 25
DT Tim Anderson 72 26
FOR
Mike Vrabel

junk
junk
junk

Dallas Baker>Tyjuan Hagler
Tim Anderson>Colin Cole
Dyson> 3rd and 5th
My junk shits on your junk

That isnt even the trade.

Plus you can't realy compare diffrent positions.

Plus you just signed Dallas Baker, cant trade FA's til preseason

Thats what you posted the trade as. And yes you can, TC does it all the time. Does it really matter though? Were basically having a bidding war over which trade can get denied by the TC, we both know these deals will never pass because even though Vrabels 33 and a 1 year rental, the TC will think hes still valuable.

Harper41 wrote:

Thats what you posted the trade as. And yes you can, TC does it all the time. Does it really matter though? Were basically having a bidding war over which trade can get denied by the TC, we both know these deals will never pass because even though Vrabels 33 and a 1 year rental, the TC will think hes still valuable.

Well we talked on aim, try agian, now what junk player you just signed from FA will you offer now?

OLB Bryan Thomas 80 29 4
CB David Barrett 78 30 2
DT Tim Anderson 72 26 1
FOR
Mike Vrabel 89 2 33

Suck It.

I'll give you

Keyunta Dawson 75|22|?- very young DT
T.J. Rushing 71|23|1- Very Young CB
Kenton Keith 76|28|3 RB
5th round pick
Rob Morris 83|33|2 ROLB 5th Round Pick

daking5 wrote:

I'll give you

Keyunta Dawson 75|22|?- very young DT
T.J. Rushing 71|23|1- Very Young CB
Kenton Keith 76|28|3 RB
5th round pick
Rob Morris 83|33|2 ROLB 5th Round Pick

Junk.
Junk.
Junk.
Junk.
Another old shitty LB.
Why would he replace a 1 year rental with another 1 year rental.

Harper41 wrote:

OLB Bryan Thomas 80 29 4
CB David Barrett 78 30 2
DT Tim Anderson 72 26 1
FOR
Mike Vrabel 89 2 33

Suck It.

Packers Give:
LB Calvin Pace 83 27
DT Colin Cole 72 27
Packers 3rd
Packers 4th

Pats Give:
LB Mike Vrabel 89 33
Pats 5th
Pats 6th



Suck it.


David Barret is trash, a 78 rated CB whos 30?