| Jets discussion | |
|
+4SoxNats08 Everything I am Big_Z Nerd85 8 posters |
|
do u hate the Jets | Yes | | 73% | [ 11 ] | No | | 27% | [ 4 ] |
| Total Votes : 15 | | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:26 pm | |
| I'm fine discussing anything with the jets here and sharing my opinion, but I'm tired of cloging up MK's DC even though the damage is allready done, so from now on post anything else in here
Last edited by Dman51592 on Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:50 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Nerd85 Veteran
Number of posts : 964 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:52 pm | |
| Does anyone else like the jets? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:59 pm | |
| nope everybodys beating up on em though |
|
| |
Big_Z Starter
Number of posts : 499 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:09 pm | |
| who is gonna play QB and who are they going to throw to besides coles?
is brad smith really that good that letting go of justin mc was a good move? | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:16 pm | |
| Brad Smith isnt that good but hes better then Justin Mcwhateverhisnameis |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:21 pm | |
| First of all what bout Cotcher with a 1000 yard season. Kellen Clemens should be a suprise this year and he was a second round pick out of Oregon. He was supposed to be higher but he faced injury problems before coming out. He is mobile and has a cannon of an arm. His main problem last year was decision making and he should have more time. The third WR spot isn't expected to be a big issue. Baker is a solid TE. He's not great but he still is on the rise, and Coles and Cotchery are still a great tandem. Chansi Stuckey is another player whos faced injuries. Expected to be a 3rd or 4th round pick, he's a burner and has great speed. Brad smith has developed well, but he has very subpar hands, but is a good decoy even though the Jets tend to only run the option with him as QB. |
|
| |
Big_Z Starter
Number of posts : 499 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:26 pm | |
| i forgot all about Y2Jerricho Cotchery
jets could be good next year, maybe a wild card | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:27 pm | |
| - Big_Z wrote:
- i forgot all about Y2Jerricho Cotchery
jets could be good next year, maybe a wild card agreed they're still a level below the top tier teams but they'll push for a birth |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:30 pm | |
| Hahaha the Robertson trade didnt go through
The Jets are officially in salary cap HELL |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:30 pm | |
| They still have a trade with Denver on the board so not really |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:33 pm | |
| You think Denvers gunna take that huge salary when the could just wait for the Jets to cut him which is what theyre gunna hafta do...The Jets royally screwed themselves, Pace gets 22 mil guaranteed?!?!?! WHAT A JOKE, he had 1 good season, he is the definition of 1 hit wonder... |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:35 pm | |
| Jets can't cut him the get a cap hit if they do he'll be trade or restructured. And the NFL salary cap is a joke. Even with everything they are 18 million under cap. That doesn't include Pennington who will have 6 million taken off his contract b/c he won't play, Barret being cut thats another 3 and Rob will at least restructure cause he wants a long term deal theres another 4 million off. Only the Skins can screw themselves over in cap and they got themselves out of it. |
|
| |
Everything I am Starter
Number of posts : 367 Registration date : 2008-02-28
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:39 pm | |
| - mksadng wrote:
- he had 1 good season, he is the definition of 1 hit wonder...
He was a DE since the day he was drafted, switched to LB last year for a chance to start, I don't think we can call him a 1 hit wonder yet considering next season hasn't even been played yet | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:41 pm | |
| - Dman51592 wrote:
- Jets can't cut him the get a cap hit if they do he'll be trade or restructured. And the NFL salary cap is a joke. Even with everything they are 18 million under cap. That doesn't include Pennington who will have 6 million taken off his contract b/c he won't play, Barret being cut thats another 3 and Rob will at least restructure cause he wants a long term deal theres another 4 million off. Only the Skins can screw themselves over in cap and they got themselves out of it.
Trust me noone is going to want to take on his contract, noone wants to play a below average player superstar money, and how do you know Rob will restructure? The Jets spent way to much money and its going to bite them in the ass. |
|
| |
Everything I am Starter
Number of posts : 367 Registration date : 2008-02-28
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:42 pm | |
| - Dman51592 wrote:
- Only the Skins can screw themselves over in cap and they got themselves out of it.
loloolololol so true, though they still only have like $3M in cap and were pursuing Lance Briggs | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 31 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:06 pm | |
| - eaglesfan90 wrote:
- Dman51592 wrote:
- Only the Skins can screw themselves over in cap and they got themselves out of it.
loloolololol so true, though they still only have like $3M in cap and were pursuing Lance Briggs hey hey hey calm down with the skins jokes were gonna have a quiet FA, dont worry | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:10 pm | |
| thats cause everybodys gone allready |
|
| |
Everything I am Starter
Number of posts : 367 Registration date : 2008-02-28
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:18 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- eaglesfan90 wrote:
- Dman51592 wrote:
- Only the Skins can screw themselves over in cap and they got themselves out of it.
loloolololol so true, though they still only have like $3M in cap and were pursuing Lance Briggs hey hey hey calm down with the skins jokes
were gonna have a quiet FA, dont worry They don't have the room to really sign anyone...well, they are talkig to Bryant Johnson, and you know they have an affinity for underachieving WRs | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:38 pm | |
| kinda curious bout the poll cause everyones beatin up on em |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 31 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| |
| |
PackersOwnAll Pro-Bowler
Number of posts : 1627 Age : 33 Location : Miltown Registration date : 2008-02-18
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:57 pm | |
| - Nerd85 wrote:
- Does anyone else like the jets?
Darrell Revis is the only Jet I like | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Wed Mar 05, 2008 1:23 pm | |
| - PackersOwnAll wrote:
- Nerd85 wrote:
- Does anyone else like the jets?
Darrell Revis is the only Jet I like he got cut |
|
| |
PackersOwnAll Pro-Bowler
Number of posts : 1627 Age : 33 Location : Miltown Registration date : 2008-02-18
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:36 pm | |
| - sexy beast wrote:
- PackersOwnAll wrote:
- Nerd85 wrote:
- Does anyone else like the jets?
Darrell Revis is the only Jet I like he got cut What? Why? | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion Wed Mar 05, 2008 5:40 pm | |
| - PackersOwnAll wrote:
- sexy beast wrote:
- PackersOwnAll wrote:
- Nerd85 wrote:
- Does anyone else like the jets?
Darrell Revis is the only Jet I like he got cut What? Why? pretty sure hes kidding | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Jets discussion | |
| |
|
| |
| Jets discussion | |
|