How will the Packers do without Favre?

How will the Packers do without Favre? Leave your opinion and vote!

And don't come in here hating on the Packers or Favre just because your a biased fag. *Cough coughTimcough coughMaxcough cough*

Well my prediction.....Rodgers get hurt in week one and craig nall has to step in....the do worse than 8 wins and get murdered by Houston

Now i went with 9-7.. idk if Rodgers can take us to like 12 or 13 wins. Ryan Grant is surly going to get like 43434 carrys this yr, hopefully we can balance out the carrys with Jackson and other guys.

We still have some of the best WR's in the league

amazingandre wrote:

Well my prediction.....Rodgers get hurt in week one and craig nall has to step in....the do worse than 8 wins and get murdered by Houston

PackersOwnAll wrote:

And don't come in here hating on the Packers or Favre just because your a biased fag

PackersOwnAll wrote:

amazingandre wrote:

Well my prediction.....Rodgers get hurt in week one and craig nall has to step in....the do worse than 8 wins and get murdered by Houston

PackersOwnAll wrote:

And don't come in here hating on the Packers or Favre just because your a biased fag

I am not hating on the Pack or Favre....the truth is Rodgers is very injury prone and Craig Nall is garbage....if Rodgers cant stay healthy you have no chance.....even if he stays healthy your looking at an 8-8 record...and to assume youll do better is naive and homerish....youre playing the afc south the best division in football and the vikings are getting a heck of a lot better.....Rodgers will not be able to take the hits like favre and he has already proven that

PackersOwnAll wrote:

Now i went with 9-7.. idk if Rodgers can take us to like 12 or 13 wins. Ryan Grant is surly going to get like 43434 carrys this yr, hopefully we can balance out the carrys with Jackson and other guys.

We still have some of the best WR's in the league

If you think
1.Grant will carry the Packers
2.The Packers will turn into a running team

You are sorely mistaken, Rodgers will be given great opportunities to succeed in passing considering the Packers had the most effective Pass blocking line, and a below average run blocking line

Pass Blocking: #1 in the League
Run Blocking: #26 in the league

Big discrepancy there

Didn't Rodgers break a foot?

Not sure I'd call that injury prone.

He'll be fine.

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

Didn't Rodgers break a foot?

Not sure I'd call that injury prone.

He'll be fine.

hes been injured in both games where he had a lot of play time.thats injury prone

I'd have to think that you'd let him play a full season or two before he could be labeled injury prone, because where he's at right now, I think unlucky would be a better tag.

Is Schaub injury prone? He seemed to miss a bunch of time this year -- his first full year starting.

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

I'd have to think that you'd let him play a full season or two before he could be labeled injury prone, because where he's at right now, I think unlucky would be a better tag.

Is Schaub injury prone? He seemed to miss a bunch of time this year -- his first full year starting.

No he just had one recurring injury and Houston's OL sucks.

SoxNats08 wrote:

No he just had one recurring injury and Houston's OL sucks.

Well Rodgers had a broken foot one game and then this year what . . . tweaked a hamstring? I would consider the two pretty comparable.

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

SoxNats08 wrote:

No he just had one recurring injury and Houston's OL sucks.

Well Rodgers had a broken foot one game and then this year what . . . tweaked a hamstring? I would consider the two pretty comparable.

I wasn't the one who called him injury prone..

I'm done in this thread.

Bottom line -- let the kid play a full season before making negative comments about him.

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

I'm done in this thread.

Bottom line -- let the kid play a full season before making negative comments about him.

Ummmm no....i said if he can stay healthy they will make it .500 and if he cant which he proved he cannot thus far they will do worse than .500....and schaub is borderline injury prone yes

amazingandre wrote:

Ummmm no....i said if he can stay healthy they will make it .500 and if he cant which he proved he cannot thus far they will do worse than .500....and schaub is borderline injury prone yes

If he can stay healthy, GB is a 10-6 team. They have a great running game, terrific defense, and some of the best wideouts in football.

All I was trying to say is that just because a guy was injured twice (one being a freak foot fracture), that doesn't exactly make him "injury prone".

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

amazingandre wrote:

Ummmm no....i said if he can stay healthy they will make it .500 and if he cant which he proved he cannot thus far they will do worse than .500....and schaub is borderline injury prone yes

If he can stay healthy, GB is a 10-6 team. They have a great running game, terrific defense, and some of the best wideouts in football.

All I was trying to say is that just because a guy was injured twice (one being a freak foot fracture), that doesn't exactly make him "injury prone".

when he plays a major role in 2 games and he is injured IN BOTH....ya that is injury prone

amazingandre wrote:

when he plays a major role in 2 games and he is injured IN BOTH....ya that is injury prone

In your opinion, but that doesn't make it fact.

One was a freak foot fracture.

The other was a minor hamstring tweak. (Which every player in NFL suffers from at some point in their career.)

Well, I'm done. We'll see how many games he finishes this year.

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

Well, I'm done. We'll see how many games he finishes this year.

I agree. Atleast 9 wins, i bet.

PackersOwnAll wrote:

I agree. Atleast 9 wins, i bet.

I say 10

Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:

PackersOwnAll wrote:

I agree. Atleast 9 wins, i bet.

I say 10

11

2-14. Land the #1 pick and draft a QB because Rogers doesnt work out

Touchdown Jesus! wrote:

2-14. Land the #1 pick and draft a QB because Rogers doesnt work out

This coming from a Raiders fan.

SoxNats08 wrote:

Touchdown Jesus! wrote:

2-14. Land the #1 pick and draft a QB because Rogers doesnt work out

This coming from a Raiders fan.

Al Davis is 1000000 years old