| HAHAHAHAHAHA | |
|
+5Vhawk413 NorCal-TitanFan Touchdown Jesus! PackersOwnAll SoxNats08 9 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:49 pm | |
| Well the thing is thats all we have to base CBs off of, we cant see PDs, TDs given up, yards given up or any of that and Justin Miller from what I can see so far is a guy whos going to get me a lot of INTs but might get beat sometimes ALA Asante Samuel and ill take an Asante Samuel esque CB on my team anyday and once again I will say you can think what you want about Justin Miller but I will take his 4 INTs on my team anyday. |
|
| |
NorCal-TitanFan Veteran
Number of posts : 740 Age : 32 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-03-13
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Sun Apr 20, 2008 4:40 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:42 am | |
| Interceptions 1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. |
|
| |
Vhawk413 Starter
Number of posts : 350 Registration date : 2008-04-12
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:44 am | |
| - Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:
- Interceptions
1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. Exactly. Just means they more than likely get thrown at a lot, and probably get beat often. | |
|
| |
steel66 Starter
Number of posts : 343 Age : 32 Registration date : 2008-04-16
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 8:34 am | |
| - Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:
- Interceptions
1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. He was a 3rd CB too... | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:15 am | |
| - steel66 wrote:
- Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:
- Interceptions
1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. He was a 3rd CB too... wow how did no one have more than 7 picks | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:47 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- steel66 wrote:
- Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:
- Interceptions
1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. He was a 3rd CB too... wow how did no one have more than 7 picks I dunno about you, but typically for me the leader always has 7 or 8 INTs | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:48 pm | |
| - mksadng wrote:
- Well the thing is thats all we have to base CBs off of, we cant see PDs, TDs given up, yards given up or any of that and Justin Miller from what I can see so far is a guy whos going to get me a lot of INTs but might get beat sometimes ALA Asante Samuel and ill take an Asante Samuel esque CB on my team anyday and once again I will say you can think what you want about Justin Miller but I will take his 4 INTs on my team anyday.
you take your 4 INTs and 8 TDs given up then. Just because you cant see the other stats doesnt mean they arent there | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:48 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- steel66 wrote:
- Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:
- Interceptions
1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. He was a 3rd CB too... wow how did no one have more than 7 picks I dunno about you, but typically for me the leader always has 7 or 8 INTs well just saying, we're in week 4 in the sim and the leaders are tied for 6 | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:51 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- steel66 wrote:
- Steve_Smith_#12 wrote:
- Interceptions
1. Marcus McCauley - 7
McCauley led the VNFL in interceptions last year . . . as a 73 rated CB.
Anyone can have a good season in a Madden Sim, doesn't make him a good player and doesn't mean that he didn't give up his fair share of TDs and long plays. He was a 3rd CB too... wow how did no one have more than 7 picks I dunno about you, but typically for me the leader always has 7 or 8 INTs well just saying, we're in week 4 in the sim and the leaders are tied for 6 not to mention the leader in INTs is higher than the leader in sacks. | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:52 pm | |
| yea that is kinda weird...
QB #s are also down... maybe its just one of those one outta one hundred things | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:55 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- yea that is kinda weird...
QB #s are also down... maybe its just one of those one outta one hundred things maybe its because everyones running a pass heavy offense and everyone knows that theyre doing that | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| |
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:58 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- yea that is kinda weird...
QB #s are also down... maybe its just one of those one outta one hundred things maybe its because everyones running a pass heavy offense and everyone knows that theyre doing that good point but sacks can only happen on pass plays, so that defeats the purpose of your logic if that were true, then both of them should be increased like x times more | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| |
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:00 pm | |
| |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:01 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:02 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- yea that is kinda weird...
QB #s are also down... maybe its just one of those one outta one hundred things maybe its because everyones running a pass heavy offense and everyone knows that theyre doing that good point
but sacks can only happen on pass plays, so that defeats the purpose of your logic
if that were true, then both of them should be increased like x times more if you're playing the pass then often your DEs will drop back into zone coverage, that or theyll try and contain the QB a little better. Not to mention, when you're playing the pass there isnt a whole lot of blitz packages, and if there is it usually involves a S or CB who have a far less likely chance of penetration | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:02 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:03 pm | |
| |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:04 pm | |
| - Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- yea that is kinda weird...
QB #s are also down... maybe its just one of those one outta one hundred things maybe its because everyones running a pass heavy offense and everyone knows that theyre doing that good point
but sacks can only happen on pass plays, so that defeats the purpose of your logic
if that were true, then both of them should be increased like x times more if you're playing the pass then often your DEs will drop back into zone coverage, that or theyll try and contain the QB a little better. Not to mention, when you're playing the pass there isnt a whole lot of blitz packages, and if there is it usually involves a S or CB who have a far less likely chance of penetration Why did we suddenly shift back to talking about Clinton Hart and Justin Miller? | |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:05 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:05 pm | |
| |
|
| |
Touchdown Jesus! Starter
Number of posts : 477 Age : 33 Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:06 pm | |
| - SoxNats08 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- Touchdown Jesus! wrote:
- SoxNats08 wrote:
- yea that is kinda weird...
QB #s are also down... maybe its just one of those one outta one hundred things maybe its because everyones running a pass heavy offense and everyone knows that theyre doing that good point
but sacks can only happen on pass plays, so that defeats the purpose of your logic
if that were true, then both of them should be increased like x times more if you're playing the pass then often your DEs will drop back into zone coverage, that or theyll try and contain the QB a little better. Not to mention, when you're playing the pass there isnt a whole lot of blitz packages, and if there is it usually involves a S or CB who have a far less likely chance of penetration Why did we suddenly shift back to talking about Clinton Hart and Justin Miller? because theyre an S and CB who loves penetration | |
|
| |
SoxNats08 All-Pro
Number of posts : 2659 Age : 30 Personalized field : Registration date : 2008-02-17
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:06 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: HAHAHAHAHAHA | |
| |
|
| |
| HAHAHAHAHAHA | |
|